Instant, expert-designed contract reviews for just £99
Every time you are about to share something sensitive, there is a moment of hesitation. You have confidential information - a business idea, a customer list, your pricing strategy, your source code, a product roadmap - that could be valuable. You need to share it to make progress, but the thought of it being leaked, used by a competitor, or shared with someone you did not intend terrifies you.
That moment of hesitation is exactly why non-disclosure agreements exist. But the agreement itself needs to actually protect you. A poorly drafted NDA gives you a false sense of security. You think your information is protected, but because of how the agreement is written, it is not. Or the definitions are so broad that they become unworkable and unenforceable. Or the remedies for breach are so weak that even if someone does violate the agreement, you have no practical way to stop them.
If you are the party sharing sensitive information, your anxiety is about protecting it. You are about to reveal something that has value - perhaps the secret that makes your business work, or the financial details that could undermine you if they got to competitors. You need the recipient to understand that this information is confidential, that they cannot use it for their own benefit, that they cannot share it with others, and that there are serious consequences if they breach the agreement. But the NDA you have been sent might have holes that let your information slip through.
If you are the party receiving the information, your anxiety is different. You are about to sign a confidentiality agreement that imposes obligations on you. Can you actually comply with these obligations? Are they so strict that you are guaranteed to breach them at some point? For example, if you are a venture capital firm, you look at dozens of business plans from entrepreneurs. If every NDA says you cannot disclose the information to your investment committee or to your own investors, you cannot function. You need to understand what obligations you are really taking on, and whether they are workable.
There is also the issue of what is actually protected. Some NDAs have such a broad definition of confidential information that everything becomes confidential - including information that should be publicly available, information you independently developed, or information that the other party did not originate. This creates disputes about what you are allowed to use.
And then there is the matter of remedies. If someone breaches an NDA, what can you actually do? Can you get an injunction (a court order stopping them from disclosing)? Can you claim damages? Or is the agreement so vague that it is hard to enforce? An NDA without strong remedies is just words on paper.
QuickLegalCheck provides instant NDA reviews for just £99. Whether you are the disclosing party wanting to protect your information, or the receiving party ensuring you can comply with the agreement, we review the terms in full and give you a plain-English report. Within minutes, you will understand what you are actually agreeing to, what information is really protected, and what happens if someone breaches it.
Non-disclosure agreements protect something of value - but only if they are properly drafted. A weak NDA can leave your most sensitive information exposed. A poorly written NDA can make you personally liable for breaches you cannot control. An agreement that is too broad can be unenforceable, leaving you with no protection at all.
Consider a real-world scenario where an entrepreneur is pitching their business idea to potential investors. The idea is novel and proprietary - it is the core of their business. They share their business plan with five different investors under NDA. One of those investors mentions some details of the business model to a friend. The entrepreneur finds out and wants to pursue a claim for breach of the NDA. But the NDA they used was vague about what constituted "confidential information" and did not clearly define what "use" or "disclosure" meant. The investor argues that casual mention to a friend is not really a "disclosure" for business purposes. The case becomes expensive and uncertain. A better-drafted NDA would have been clear that any unauthorized disclosure, including casual conversation, was prohibited.
Or consider a software company that is given a detailed NDA to sign before being allowed to see a potential client's system architecture. The NDA is so broad that it defines "confidential information" as including virtually anything the client tells the software company. The software company cannot disclose the information to their own development team, cannot store it on their secure servers, and cannot even reference it in their own internal documentation. The NDA becomes so strict that the software company cannot actually do the work the client wants them to do. If the software company signs this NDA, they are setting themselves up for breach.
For investors and large companies that review many proposals and agreements, overly broad NDAs can be operationally impossible. If every NDA says you cannot disclose information to your board, your investment committee, or your own advisors, you cannot operate. A properly drafted NDA should allow disclosure to those with a legitimate need to know.
There is also the issue of duration. Some NDAs impose confidentiality obligations that last forever. While some information (like trade secrets) might merit indefinite protection, imposing indefinite obligations on commercially sensitive information that becomes obsolete in a few years is unreasonable. An NDA should have a reasonable duration that reflects the true sensitivity of the information.
That is why reviewing an NDA before you sign matters. Whether you are protecting sensitive information or taking on obligations, understanding the agreement is critical.
Our process is designed to give you fast, clear answers without the cost and delay of a traditional solicitor.
Upload your contract in Word or PDF format
Our AI system, built by contract specialists, analyses the document in detail
You receive a plain-English report identifying risks, missing clauses, and recommendations
Must be broad enough to protect what matters but workable enough to comply with.
Should state why information is being shared and limit its use to that purpose.
Sets out what the recipient must do to protect the information.
Information already public, independently developed, or lawfully obtained from another source should be excluded.
How long confidentiality obligations last. Often 2-5 years, or indefinite for trade secrets.
What happens to the information when the relationship ends.
The right to seek injunctions and damages if confidentiality is breached.
Whether both parties share confidential information or only one party discloses.
If the definition includes things that should not be confidential (like general business knowledge, or information already in the public domain), it becomes unenforceable or causes disputes. Conversely, if the definition is too vague ("all information provided"), it creates ambiguity about what is actually protected.
Some information should not be confidential - information already public, information independently developed, information lawfully obtained from a third party, or information in the public domain before disclosure. Without these exclusions, almost everything becomes confidential, making the agreement unworkable and potentially unenforceable.
Some NDAs require the recipient to store information in ways that are not practical (like never storing it on servers or computers), or to prevent all internal disclosure even to those with a legitimate business need. Obligations should be reasonable and reflect the actual sensitivity of the information.
Imposing confidentiality obligations for 10 years or indefinitely on information that becomes obsolete in 2-3 years is unreasonable and potentially unenforceable. Duration should be tailored to the sensitivity and commercial life of the information - typically 2-5 years for most commercial information, possibly longer for true trade secrets.
If the NDA does not include a right to seek injunctions or damages, it is very hard to enforce. An NDA without strong remedies is just words on paper. The remedies section should clearly state that breach causes irreparable harm and that the disclosing party is entitled to seek injunctions and damages.
If you are the disclosing party, clearly identify the information you are protecting with a precise definition, limit the purpose of disclosure to what is actually needed, clearly specify what the recipient cannot do with the information, and ensure remedies are strong enough to deter misuse. Include clear exclusions for information already public, independently developed, or lawfully obtained from another source - this makes the agreement enforceable by showing you are protecting only what is genuinely confidential. Be reasonable about duration - most commercial information does not need to be protected for more than 5 years.
If you are the receiving party, ensure the definition of confidential information is precise and workable, that the exclusions are adequate and protect you from being liable for information that is not truly confidential, and that the obligations are not so strict that you cannot actually do business or comply with them. Negotiate for the ability to disclose to your own employees, contractors, and advisors who have a legitimate need to know. Ensure you understand the duration - indefinite obligations should only apply to true trade secrets. Request clarity on what happens to the information after the NDA ends (do you have to destroy it, or can you keep it on a backup that is not accessed?)
Traditional solicitor reviews are thorough but often expensive and slow. A solicitor may charge £500 to £1,500 plus VAT for a detailed review, and turnaround times can be several days or even weeks.
QuickLegalCheck offers an alternative that is both faster and more affordable, without sacrificing clarity. Our £99 instant contract review gives you a written report in plain English, focusing on the key issues, risks, and practical improvements. The process is confidential, secure, and entirely online.
A one-way NDA is signed when only one party is disclosing confidential information (the disclosing party) and the other is receiving and protecting it (the receiving party). A mutual NDA is when both parties are both disclosing and receiving information, and both are bound by the same confidentiality obligations. Mutual NDAs are common when partners are discussing a joint venture. One-way NDAs are common when an employee receives confidential information from an employer, or when an entrepreneur pitches to investors.
This depends on the NDA. A reasonable NDA will allow you to disclose to employees, contractors, and advisors who have a legitimate business need to know and who are bound by the same confidentiality obligations. However, some NDAs restrict even internal disclosure. When signing an NDA, negotiate to ensure you can disclose to those who need to know to do their jobs. If you are an NDA drafter, always include this flexibility.
The NDA should specify this. Options include: the recipient must destroy all copies, the recipient must return all copies to the discloser, the information remains confidential even after the NDA ends (for trade secrets), or the information can be retained on archived backups that are not accessed. This matters because it determines what the recipient can do with copies of information after the relationship ends.
That depends on whether the NDA is properly drafted and whether you can prove a breach caused you damage. If the NDA clearly defines confidential information, the obligations on the recipient, and the remedies for breach (including injunctions and damages), it is generally enforceable. However, if the definition is too vague or too broad, a court might find it unenforceable. This is why a review of the NDA before signing matters.
Upload your non-disclosure agreement and get a clear, detailed review within minutes — for just £99.
Upload Your Contract